Wednesday, April 25, 2012

Discussion Questions for Setting


Setting is a pretty important aspect of my writing, but I personally don’t think it’s always needed. What needs to be understood when writing is that everything must have a reason for being there. If you’re writing a detailed setting just because you believe the reader needs to know exactly what the place looks like, you’re wasting your audience’s time. Of course setting is not always the physical place, but it still applies. If those details don’t help your story, there is no reason for it. Sometimes I leave out the physical setting because all that is important is the interaction between the characters. Most of the time, I leave the setting very vague and let the reader building the setting in their own mind. This is because the reader will pull from their personal life, or from things they enjoy, thus making it more comfortable for the reader. The reason I do this is because, as a wise woman once told me, “You write what you want to read.” 


Shanty for the Arethusa 

The Decemberists

 

We set to sail on a packet full of spice, rum, and tea leaves
We've emptied out all the bars and the bowery hotels
Tell your daughters, do not walk the streets alone tonight
Tell your daughters, do not walk the streets alone tonight

To tell the tale of the Jewess and the Mandarin Chinese boy

He led her down from her gilded canopy of cloth
And through her blindfold she could make out the figures there before her
And how the air was thick with incense, cardamom, and myrrh

So goodnight, boys, goodnight

Say goodnight, boys, goodnight

We set to sail on the clipper that's bound for South Australia

The weather's warm there, the natives are dark and nubile
But if you listen, quiet, you can hear the footsteps on the cross-trees
The ghosts of sailors passed, their spectral bodies clinging to the shrouds

So goodnight, boys, goodnight

Say goodnight, boys, goodnight

To explain this would be a little difficult, as you sort of need to take the Decemberists with a bitten tongue and a grain of salt. A lot of the theories for the song is that it’s pirates raping people, or that it’s about slavery. Others are a bit broader in their theories, saying it was generally how rough the men of the sea were. Overall, you can see that it describes a group of people who may not be too kind getting their just desserts at the end. 

What struck me the most in the lyrics of this song, and which also follows some of Cheatham’s teachings, is the correct use of adjectives. A good example of this from the song would be “gilded canopy of cloth.” Rather than calling it a golden cloth, Colin Meloy uses interesting word choice to make the phrase memorable when read as well as sung. 

Another thing from Cheatham’s teachings that is also in the lyrics is how it engages the five sense. I can smell the spice, rum and tea leaves as well as the incense, cardamom, and myrrh. The fact that the latter is thick in the air makes me think of how my eyes would still slightly and how I couldn’t exactly see through, which was said in the previous line. In those two lines about the products, it also engages your taste, as most often when you can smell something you can taste it in the air. In verse three, we’re told the weather is warm in South Australia, which is touch sensory. We’re told that if we listen quietly we can hear the footsteps on the cross-tress, engaging our ears.  

There are plenty more of Cheatham’s teachings in there and I’m sure I could apply them all somewhere. I’ve only decided to mention those which stuck out to me most and/or were used the most. I’d also like to mention briefly that a lot of the Decemberists songs are able to use these teachings and definitely display strong word choice skills.

Saturday, April 14, 2012

Auditorium


I finally received a request and I decided to take a look at the game. So, this week I will be reviewing…



Upon receiving the request to review this game, I told my boyfriend, Adam, about it. I often do that. He decided that he would buy the game for us and I could play through it to ensure that it was properly reviewed. 

When I opened the game, I was greeted by really beautiful (Read: ear-gasmic) piano music and then when it got to the opening screen, the song built up nicely. The “Auditorium” title popped up with the instruction to click anywhere to begin, which I actually don’t care to much for when you open it up over and over again and just need to go through the 20 second opening every time. It’s not a completely painful opening, not like starting a new game of Kingdom Hearts. 

So, basically the point of the game is to get all the bars on the page to full height by diverting the ‘wind’ with the tools you have. My biggest problem with this is that when I started I had no idea what to do with the different tools. There are no instructions. You basically have to play the game and figure out what the heck you’re supposed to do. I guess that isn’t a terrible thing because it’s kind of fun to figure out things for yourself, but I’m not sure if it’s due to the laziness of the creators or because of their want to make it a very simple game. In any case, it’s just a nitpick and probably not that much of a bother for most people.


Dem lights. Dat Music. 

My favourite part about this game is how relaxing and soothing it is to play it. I didn’t get angry when I couldn’t solve a song, I just closed it and went back to it later. It’s amazing to be sitting there and finally get it and jump out of your stupor of euphoric eargasms yell “I AM THE GREATEST MAESTRO!”

In conclusion, Auditorium isn’t exactly my favourite puzzle game (that would be Portal), but it’s definitely a good one. I do recommend it for people who like to just open up something when their bored and figure out some puzzles. It’s especially good for relaxing due to the music in the game. I love me some orchestra music. 

***

The Romantically Apocalyptic Review: Part 2 should be up within the next week. I'm sorry for the wait for those who have been waiting for it!